Week 1 Article Critique

Use the Campbellsville University Library databases to do research on peer-reviewed journal articles on the topic of Management Information Systems (do not use Google or Wikipedia).Choose an article that includes all parts listed in the Article Critique Rubric located on the Moodle course page. Type your responses directly into the word file.
*Students should type directly into the chart below.

Parts of Article Critique

Student Responses

Your First and Last Name

Author(s) First and Last Name

Article Title

Publication Date: Year (within last 10 years)

Journal Name

Journal Volume

Journal Number

Journal Pages (range, ex. 1-10)

Article Abstract: highlight and copy the exact abstract from the article chosen and paste the abstract here

Takeaway: In a bulleted list, write complete sentences about three things you have learned from the article.
*The takeaway should be written in your own words with no similarity.



Editorial Introduction
Approaching the fifth decade of its publication, JMIS has always stood for a broad under-
standing of the remit of our discipline and for the multiplicity of research methodologies
that undergird its sociotechnical approach to the study of information systems (IS). Indeed,
we have been privileged to contribute significantly to the definition of our boundaries. The
recent years, combining a broad societal change with the vastly enhanced role of IS in society
whose transformations it is driving in many ways, validate this approach to our field.
The present issue of the Journal contributes to our understanding and, one hopes, action in
two crucial realms. The Special Issue focusing on fake news (FN) we present to you offers
a comprehensive (insofar as special issues can do that) analysis of a global societal ill enabled by
the Internet. To follow it, an emergent section of three papers presents the societal good enabled
and to a degree driven by IS: the approaches and the boons of health informatics. As we study
the deleterious effects of FN, we should always keep in mind the good that the Internet-Web
compound has brought the world in the societal growth and in the economic development.
The Special Issue on Fake News on the Internet, guest edited by Alan R. Dennis, Dennis
F. Galletta, and Jane Webster, offers a multidisciplinary analysis of the destructive global
phenomenon. The Guest Editors provide a valuable introduction to the issue they have edited
to which 80 submissions were received. It is my place here to add some context and perspective.
“Fake News” is a shorthand for the production, dissemination, and amplification of
misinformation originated with an intent to deceive. On the Internet, it may be a fake
product review, placed by a competitor, and conceivably integrated into a hostile campaign
by a firm specializing in such services. It may also be fake information about a political
candidate deployed as a component in a political campaign devised to pervert the demo-
cratic process of an election. The first FN may damage a brand, the second may distort the
outcome of the election and, beyond that, shake people’s faith in democracy. The actors may
be individuals or it may be the Russian Internet Research Agency specializing in disin-
formation as a state organization formed for influence and propaganda purposes. In fact,
state actors may be joined by unaffiliated individuals to diffuse and obscure responsibility,
and to provide deniability.
FN is not a novel phenomenon. The arrival of new media technologies always has dual,
Janus-like, effects, with the dark side being the reverse of the bright coin. The invention of the
printed press in the 15th century did not only bring access to the Bible and literacy to the now
more enlightened populace. For centuries, it has also brought threats and transformation to
the established orders. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, a philosopher who was no particular friend of
his contemporary order, had this to say in 1750 for the ages: “If we consider the horrible
disorders that printing press has already produced in Europe . . . ” (cited in Rauch [6], p.120).
Scurrilous printed pamphlets bearing salacious FN about the respective royal consorts kindled
the flames of two revolutions, French and Russian, by delegitimizing and “de-majestifying”
the reigning houses. Some FN books have lasted centuries, in the ever new editions.
However, there is a huge difference. Powerful technologies have powerful consequences. The
power of the Internet and associated information technologies lends the online FN a particular
2021, VOL. 38, NO. 4, 889–892
© 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
weight. Social media are the principal means of the unholy spiral in spreading FN. Yet the
phenomenon of rapid social amplification on the Internet was identified well before the arrival
of social media [10]. Here are the principal reasons the FN on today’s Internet present a threat to
social order and its democratic transformation. The public sphere created by the Internet-Web
is massive and global. The global and dense network of networks and software-stack connectiv-
ity can import impacts across distant borders. The smartphone as an edge device is accessible to
billions of people around the globe. Social media, with the prevailing anonymity of the actors,
are based on platforms owned by colossal tech companies that absorb huge profits and massive
data. Big data aggregates allow microtargeting of algorithmically personalized real or fake news
at the algorithmically defined best responders. Thus, frictionless access to powerful social media
platforms facilitates the origination and spreading of FN. Monetization of FN through advertis-
ing is a potent driver of their ubiquity. Softbots delivering news to the users according to their
profile, magnify the phenomenon. Business models of smaller rogue firms, actually based on
exploiting FN, are particularly effective in disseminating online falsehoods at a profit when the
costs of communications approach zero.
The onymous author of an article in established print media bears the mantle of expertise,
experience, and authority, and her reputation and career prospects are at stake when she
publishes. The bearer of FN on the Internet can be just about anyone. And many in the reading
public are not equipped to tell the difference and are prone to share and endorse. With that, we
have what has been called “a hype machine” [1]. The problem we are dealing with here is that
much of what is being hyped is false and there are many falsities that are being hyped.
It is important to recognize and study all these factors in the blooming of FN in order to
seek the points and means of intervention and countermeasures. Like the interdisciplinary
study that is required, the measures will entail laws and regulations, a variety of technolo-
gical means, international cooperation, and education. A fundamental issue is that the
spread of FN is based on IT and driven algorithmically. To match this, Facebook employs
15,000 moderators to battle misinformation [3] – and that is woefully insufficient if only in
matching the speed of the spread (also, who said that the online big tech does not generate
jobs?). Any movement towards solutions has to encompass a variety of means, certainly
technological and algorithmic, but going well beyond that.
On the demand side, we should recognize the susceptibility to the false belief lent to FN.
This is particularly so during the years of the pandemic that bear social isolation, cliquish-
ness, and sense of vulnerability. Of a lie there is an infinite variety; there is only one truth.
A lie can be made infinitely colorful; truth attracts the adjective “stark.” Lie then entices
attention; attention can be sold. The very nature and the often skillful design of FN bear
more novelty or sensationalism than the real information, which makes them attractive
algorithmically and otherwise to the platforms supported by advertisement. Conspiracy
theories are more exciting to many than straight news. Confirmation bias makes people
susceptible to the FN reaffirming their prior beliefs. To reproduce the apt title of one of the
empirically grounded publications of our field: “People believe what they want to believe
when it makes no sense at all” [4]. The empirics confirm that FN spread faster and more
broadly than real news [8]. The virality of lies has been well expressed by Jonathan Swift:
“Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it” [7].
The FN phenomenon has marked societal effects. The post-factuality we experience
damages the epistemic order and open societies. The erosion of trust in a society has been
linked by extensive research to the damages to social order and to economic prosperity.
890 V. ZWASS
Owing to its sociotechnical nature, our discipline has much to offer in seeking out the roots
and solutions to the scourge of FN. For example, social norms have been found effective in
combating FN on social media [2]. Formal modeling has been deployed to recommend
platform policies to counteract FN [5]. Rating the reliability of news sources, labeling
individual messages, blocking messages deemed unreliable by various criteria, limiting the
number of repostings or “likes” certainly address the issue, but certainly do not scale up to the
multifaceted problem. Our research must inform the promulgation of laws and regulations
that will necessarily accompany the technological fixes. Over the recent years, JMIS has
published a series of papers proposing and testing solutions to some of the deception
problems in various contexts, some as early as 2004 [9]. We shall continue to do so.
The papers in the present Special Issue analyze numerous problems associated with the
supply of FN and the demand for them, mutually reinforcing actions. One of the papers
offers a valuable systematization of the multidisciplinary (as necessary) research on FN and
induces an integrated research model. Some of the papers also propose solutions and study
empirically their effectiveness. The efforts are valiant and present valuable remedies. We
need to stress the obvious: at present there is no comprehensive solution. This is another of
the massive problems we are faced with since the Internet has been overlaid by the Web,
such as security and privacy. The combination of multiple methodologies, positivist,
interpretive, and design-scientific included, is at our disposal. We must persevere, since
our discipline has much light to shed in all of these dark areas, and so we hope.
Three papers that follow the Special Issue form an important section of its own, as they
bring the IS research to bear on health and wellbeing. The first of these works, authored by
Shuo Yu, Yidong Chai, Hsinchun Chen, Randall A. Brown, Scott J. Sherman, and Jay
F. Nunamaker, Jr., addresses the use of IT in the remote detection of human falls, potentially
life-threatening events, particularly in the independent living of seniors. The paper advances
our ability to deploy wearable fall sensors to a greater advantage along several avenues. It
avoids manual feature extraction of the sensor-provided data, which is labor-intensive,
relatively subjective, and not scalable. The approach taken here combines deep learning
with the explainability of the results. The authors propose and test a Hierarchical Attention-
based Convolutional Neural Network as the implementation of the approach they take. The
work uses design-science methodology to demonstrate the solution’s worth and superiority
with benchmarking against large fall-detection data sets and with a case study.
Two subsequent papers apply IT to two crucial problems in a hospital setting. The
first of them, by Yu-Kai Lin and Xiao Fang, targets predictive analytics at the adverse
events that befall patients in hospitals. Known as iatrogenic events, these occurrences
are the consequence of the medical management of a patient rather than of the disease
itself, and they are not uncommon. The costs to the patients’ health and wellbeing are
high, and so are the financial costs. Within the design-science paradigm, the authors
present a novel model for the prediction of in-hospital adverse events which integrates
several sophisticated techniques. The empirical evaluation demonstrates that the
authors’ model outperforms other known methods. Beyond that, the authors use
simulation to show the cost saving that could accrue to the implementation of their
approach in the inpatient care. The reduction of adverse events with the use of the
proposed model is of an obvious practical value.
The work of Pankush Kalgotra and Ramesh Sharda uses modeling to predict the patient’s
length of stay in the hospital at the time of admission. Owing to the many factors involved,
this is a difficult problem, complicated by the potential comorbidities that can emerge
during the stay, beyond the primary complaint and the comorbidities identified at the time
of admission. The need to readmit a patient owing to a curtailed hospital stay obviously
does not serve well any of the stakeholders, the patient in particular. To address the
problem, the authors define the construct of latent comorbidities, comprising the network
of the historical and probable comorbidities and their interdependencies. The researchers
use deep learning fed by a very large database of patient records to model the determinants
of the length of stay and to predict its duration.
The three health-informatics papers taken together offer a clear and significant benefit to
medical practice – and demonstrate the capabilities of our discipline to deal with societal
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
1. Aral, S. The Hype Machine. New York: Currency, 2020.
2. Gimpel H.; Heger, S.; Olenberger, C.: and Utz, L. The effectiveness of social norms in fighting
fake news on social media. Journal of Management Information Systems, 38, 1 (2021), 196–221.
3. “It’s all connected, man,” The Economist, September 4, 2021, pp, 47–48.
4. Moravec, P.L., Minas, R.K, and Dennis, A. Fake news on social media: People believe what they
want to believe when it makes no sense at all. MIS Quarterly, 43: 4 (2019), pp.1343–1360.
5. Papanastasiou Y. Fake news propagation and detection: A sequential model, Management
Science, 66, 5 (2020), pp. 1826–1846.
6. Rauch, J. The Constitution of Knowledge: A Defense of Truth. Washington, D.C., Brookings
Institution Press, 2021.
7. Swift, J. Political lying, in Craik, H., ed., English Prose, 1916. https://www.bartleby.com/209/
633.html (accessed on 9/23/2021).
8. Vasoughi, S., Roy, D., and Aral, S. The spread of true and false news online, Science 359,
6380 (2018), 1146–1151.
9. Zhou, L., Burgoon, J.K., Twitchell, D.P., Qin, T., Nunamaker Jr., J.F. A comparison of
classification methods for predicting deception in computer-mediated communication,
Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 4 (2004), 139–165.
10. Zwass, V. Electronic commerce: structures and issues, International Journal of Electronic
Commerce, 1, 1 (1996), 3–23.
Vladimir Zwass
892 V. ZWASS
Copyright of Journal of Management Information Systems is the property of Taylor & Francis
Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv
without the copyright holder’s express written permission. However, users may print,
download, or email articles for individual use.
Disclosure statement
Zwass, V. (2021). Editorial Introduction. Journal of Management Information Systems, 38(4), 889–892.

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more