Literature Review: Annotated Bibliography Assignment

Write a brief critical
synopsis of each journal, book, etc. on your topic. After going through your
reading list, you will have an abstract or annotation of each source you read.
Later annotations are likely to include more references to other works since
you will have your previous readings to compare, but, at this point, the
important goal is to get accurate critical summaries of each individual work.
Each reference must be formatted per APA and listed before the synopsis.
An annotated bibliography is a list of sources (books,
journals, Web sites, periodicals, etc.) one has used for researching a topic (“Annotated
Bibliographies”, 2021).
Instructions
For all sources used in your Literature Review you
should:
You
should have a minimum of 15 sources.
Provide
an APA formatted references(this should look like what you would
include in a normal reference section.)
Summarize
the source and discuss the research study that
was conducted and what the findings were.
Assessthe
source and discuss how useful it is and how it compares with other sources
in your paper.
Reflect
on how the source will be useful to you in your Literature
Review. How does it help to shape your argument and how are you using it
to shape your writing?
Each annotation should look like:
Author (year). Title of article. Title of Journal, Vol no(issue). Pg to pg., URL or doi
In your summary, you will begin with a discussion of
the research question the study is attempting to answer. You will summarize the
research that was conducted and the specific findings that were uncovered. You
will then provide a summary of what this means for the topic.
Next, you will discuss how the source compares with
other sources in your paper and how useful is the source in attributing to your
writing.
Finally, you will discuss how the source is useful in
your Literature Review You will need to be specific on why it is important to
use and exactly how you will use it in your writing to shape your arguments.TOPIC: ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
ATTACHED FILE(S)
Criteria Ratings Points
Annotated
Bibliography:
Content
56 to >51.0 pts
Advanced
All key components of the
Annotated bibliography are
present. The bibliography
contains the fifteen
scholarly sources that are
three years old or less. The
sources are current and
relevant to the topic. An
annotation exists for each
source listed. Each
annotation correctly
summarizes/describes the
corresponding source and
demonstrates critical
thinking skills regarding
interpretation and
application of material.
51 to >46.0 pts
Proficient
Most of the components of
the Annotated bibliography
are present.The
bibliography contains at
least 14 scholarly sources
that are three years old or
less. All the sources are
current and relevant to the
topic. An annotation exists
for each source listed. Each
annotation correctly
summarizes/describes the
corresponding source and
demonstrates critical
thinking skills regarding
interpretation and
application of material.
46 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The Annotated
bibliography does not
include all the
components. The
bibliography contains
less than 14 scholarly
sources that are three
years old or less. An
annotation does not
exist for each source.
Each annotation does
not correctly
summarizes/describes
the corresponding
source or demonstrates
critical thinking skills
regarding interpretation
and application of
material.
0 pts
Not
Present
56 pts
Annotated
Bibliography:
Grammar
and Spelling,
APA
formatting
24 to >21.0 pts
Advanced
Spelling and grammar are
correct. Sentences are
complete, clear, and
concise. The annotations
contain appropriately
varied sentence structures.
The bibliography is
formatted per APA. The
entries are properly
formatted. A cover sheet is
present that is formatted
per APA.
21 to >19.0 pts
Proficient
Spelling and grammar has
some errors. Sentences are
presented as well. The
annotations contain some
varied sentence structures.
Some APA formatting
issues are present. A cover
sheet is present that is
formatted per APA.
19 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Spelling and grammar
errors distract.
Sentences are
incomplete or unclear.
The annotations are
poorly formed. APA
formatting is not used.
There is not a cover
sheet present.
0 pts
Not
Present
24 pts
Total Points: 80
Literature Review: Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric |
BUSI610_B04_202230
BUSI 610
Literature Review Annotated Bibliography Assignment Instructions
Overview
Write a brief critical synopsis of each journal, book, etc. on your topic. After going through your reading list, you will have an abstract or annotation of each source you read. Later annotations are likely to include more references to other works since you will have your previous readings to compare, but, at this point, the important goal is to get accurate critical summaries of each individual work. Each reference must be formatted per APA and listed before the synopsis.
An annotated bibliography is a list of sources (books, journals, Web sites, periodicals, etc.) one has used for researching a topic (“Annotated Bibliographies”, 2021).
Instructions
For all sources used in your Literature Review you should:
· You should have a minimum of 15 sources.
· Provide an APA formatted references(this should look like what you would include in a normal reference section.)
· Summarize the source and discuss the research study that was conducted and what the findings were.
· Assessthe source and discuss how useful it is and how it compares with other sources in your paper.
· Reflect on how the source will be useful to you in your Literature Review. How does it help to shape your argument and how are you using it to shape your writing?
Each annotation should look like:
Author (year). Title of article. Title of Journal, Vol no(issue). Pg to pg., URL or doi
In your summary, you will begin with a discussion of the research question the study is attempting to answer. You will summarize the research that was conducted and the specific findings that were uncovered. You will then provide a summary of what this means for the topic.
Next, you will discuss how the source compares with other sources in your paper and how useful is the source in attributing to your writing.
Finally, you will discuss how the source is useful in your Literature Review You will need to be specific on why it is important to use and exactly how you will use it in your writing to shape your arguments.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Running Head: Literature Review – Organizational Behavior 2
Literature Review – Organizational Behavior 2
Organization Behavior.
Institution:
Student’s name:
Date:
Roles in the Workplace
According to Preskar’s research from 2020, an organization’s structure should be designed to allow workers to take responsibility for their job without requiring constant micromanagement. It is necessary to have unambiguous definitions of roles and duties to categorize professionals according to their level of experience and expertise, and finally by the degree to which they are needed against the number of people who possess the necessary skills. “people spend a substantial amount of time working and building connections” in organizations, making organizations an essential group (p. 1057). The company’s overall productivity and sense of unity are significantly influenced by the organizational structure it now employs. “Organizations must develop a positive relational environment in the workplace to enable workers to enhance their resources to face ongoing changes in work to promote their well-being. It is essential that the various levels of management in an organization share responsibility for its duties in an equitable manner. The writers discussed above investigated several different approaches to organizational design by identifying roles and areas inside the organization.
Consequently, Preskar’s method was less complicated and got directly to the point, using concepts and reasoning based on organizational design. Tasselli et al. describe a workplace in their book that has workers spending a significant amount of time working together and getting to know one another. Since incivility in the workplace is not always evident, there is a chance that a person would experience a loss of their sense of self-worth if they are subjected to it (2018). In their view, the pursuit of a single objective by a group of people who come from various backgrounds and have had a variety of experiences might have potentially detrimental repercussions. It has a domino effect on an organization’s culture when individuals abuse the authority to harass or criticize their colleagues.
Reference.
Preskar, M., & Žižek, S. Š. (2020). The effect of organizational culture on organizational energy. InRecent Advances in the Roles of Cultural and Personal Values in Organizational Behavior(pp. 36-54). IGI Global.
Tasselli, S., Kilduff, M., & Landis, B. (2018). Personality change: Implications for organizational behavior.Academy of Management Annals,12(2), 467-493.
Running Head: Organizational Behavior Literature Review 2
Organizational Behavior Literature Review. 2
Organizational Behavior Literature Review.
Institution:
Student’s name:
Date:
Organization Behavior.
Abstract.
This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the research that has already been conducted on organizational behavior, leadership, and motivation. The organization’s executive leadership will be analyzed about the corporate leadership, as well as any potential problems that may appear. Because the assessment would be carried out from the perspective of senior management inside the organization, gathering the requisite source material for this study requires significant physical observation and access to crucial data. The collected information will be reviewed with the help of a variety of organizational behavioral theories to conclude and, if required, to provide some suggestions.
Introduction.
According to Tasselli (2018), organizations are human-created entities in which people interact and interdepend to achieve a shared purpose within a framework. An organization’s aims may or may not be shared by every organization member. For an accurate assessment of organizational behavior, a systems perspective and a knowledge of people-organization relationships in terms of the entire individual, group, organization, and social system are necessary (OB). Organizational behavior encompasses topics such as human behavior, leadership, and collaboration. Through the development of stronger interpersonal relationships, OB seeks to help people, organizations, and society accomplish their goals. To successfully analyze, influence, control, and manage organizational dynamics and results, one must thoroughly understand organizational behavior (OB).
A Systems Approach to Organizational Behavior.
Interdisciplinary systems theory seeks to understand the nature of complex systems. Based on the necessity to comprehend the interdependence of species in ecosystems, biology devised a useful framework for investigating and defining any connection, network, or combination of factors that interact together to generate the desired result in the 1920s (Preskar,2020). The open systems approach, which has been widely praised for decades, is an excellent way to research organizational complexity. In systems theory, it is critical to remember that the sum of the parts surpasses the whole (Gagné, 2018).
Organizations as Open Systems
The inputs and outputs of an organization are interconnected systems. Organizational systems thinking emphasizes organizations’ interconnectedness and interaction nature (Tasselli, 2018). Although corporate systems are complex, this does not mean that all activities take place inside the organization’s boundaries. As he points out, the idea that these systems are self-sufficient and independent of their users is dangerous.
An open systems OB model is based on the idea that organizations acquire inputs from the outside world, updated and returned in exchange for new intakes. Firms must meet environmental standards on both the information and output sides (Latham, 2019). Customers, suppliers, shareholders, governments, and any other entities interested in the company are considered part of the firm’s external environment.
Elements of an Open System Organization
External pressures may impact and change an organization’s structure and functioning. A system is a collection of interconnected subsystems that work together to achieve a common goal. Organizations are ITO (input-transformation-output) systems because they employ resources to generate products and services; organizations are ITO (input-transformation-output) systems. These are the components of an open system organization: The external environment of an organization comprises the surrounding situations and events. A company cannot fulfill its goals unless it addresses an external force or entity.
Conclusion, Suggestion and Recommendation
Li (2019) says that organizations that fail because they can’t adapt to change. This study looks at strategic organizational behavior (OB) factors that may affect the long-term success of organizations that care about World Heritage properties. Organizations must be aware of change while it is still possible to act on it if they want to be successful and last. Companies could lose money if they don’t realize that successfully putting an organization’s strategy into action depends on careful planning and strict OBM principles. Historic organizations will have long-term success and sustainable growth if their managers are committed to achieving their goals within the OBM framework.
Latham (2019), feels that the field of Organizational Behavior (OB) is disinterested in theory building and prefers to accept or adopt a range of theoretical approaches. Organizational Behavior is defined by pragmatism and a focus on application. Therefore, it stands to reason that this is the case. Another issue concerns the study’s conclusions’ application and trustworthiness in the real world (Li, 2019). Martin believes that cosmic generalizations should not be based on the findings of a single, inconsequential sample. There must be an accurate examination of the situation, understanding that there may be a large amount of new material to investigate. Even if Martin is faithful in principle, his disdain for the vast majority of research performed in this manner diminishes the value and impact of any study that exposes even a critical facet of the issue under investigation.
Furthermore, Latham (2019) observes that OB research often examines publications, ideas, and case studies from the viewpoint of Western developed nations. Contributions from developing nations, as well as those authored in languages other than English, are underrepresented. This is why the issue is approached from a restricted viewpoint. National cultural norms influence workplace behavior, which must be considered. However, it should be noted that many South African institutions are somewhat westernized. As emphasized in the evaluation of Best Practices in World Heritage sites, examples from African nations are limited, perhaps owing to poor management or inaccurate record-keeping.
References.
Gagné, M. (2018). From strategy to action: transforming organizational goals into organizational behavior.International Journal of Management Reviews,20, S83-S104.
Latham, G. P. (2019). Perspectives of a practitioner-scientist on organizational psychology/organizational behavior.Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior,6, 1-16.
Li, Y., Lu, Y., Cui, Q., & Han, Y. (2019). Organizational behavior in megaprojects: Integrative review and directions for future research.Journal of management in engineering,35(4), 04019009.
Preskar, M., & Žižek, S. Š. (2020). The effect of organizational culture on organizational energy. InRecent Advances in the Roles of Cultural and Personal Values in Organizational Behavior(pp. 36-54). IGI Global.
Tasselli, S., Kilduff, M., & Landis, B. (2018). Personality change: Implications for organizational behavior.Academy of Management Annals,12(2), 467-493.