Can you answer this question ?

Research topic is Recommendations for Solving Low Rates of College Readiness at James Monroe High School, West Virginia and the theoretical framwork example is just to show how the assignment should look but dont use anything in the example and make sure to follow the advanced side of the grading rubic
no
ATTACHED FILE(S)
EDUC 850
Theoretical Framework Assignment Instructions
Overview
Research is typically explained, or supported, by a theoretical framework. The question to ask when writing the theoretical framework is “how does the theory inform the problem?” The information in the theoretical framework must present the theory and theorist, coordinating concepts, and rationale for utilizing the theory for the research with a clear connection drawn between the theory and the proposed research.
Instructions
For this assignment, you will use the information from the textbook reading to write a 1-2-page theoretical framework for your research. Choose one theory to explain your research.
· The first page should be a correctly APA formatted title page that includes the title of your study written as required in the textbook and the applied research report. Do not title this assignment “Theoretical Framework Assignment.”
· The second and third pages should be a well-written theoretical framework for your research. This paper must have level one and two headings. Include at least five peer-reviewed scholarly articles using citations. You may not go over the two-page limit, and you must meet the 1-2-page limit (within ¼ of a page either direction). Your voice, as the researcher, must be evident in the explanation of how this theory is appropriate for your research. This must be submitted as one Word document.
· The last page must be the Reference page.
You must use the information from the textbook reading this week to be successful on this assignment.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
1
IMPROVING STUDENT TEST SCORES
Recommendations for Solving the Problem of Low Test Scores on the Ohio Educational Assessment for Science at Hampton High School
Liberty Student
School of Education, Liberty University
In partial fulfillment of EDUC 850
Author Note
I have no known conflict of interest to disclose.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Student Name, 1971 University Boulevard, Lynchburg, VA 24515. Email: student@liberty.edu
Theoretical Framework
The main purpose of the theoretical framework is to guide the research and allow the researcher to focus on a specific goal (Merriam & Tisdell, 2016). In addition, a solid theoretical framework is used to identify the problem related to the research topic, guide the development of the research questions, and determine the best type of research method for answering those questions. The theory used to explain this research was the measurement of intelligence theory by Binet and Simon (1916).
The measurement of intelligence theory by Binet and Simon (1916) provides a framework and foundation for modern standardized tests. The theory posits that intelligence cannot be measured through a singular tool; rather, the broad nature of one’s intelligence can only be fairly measured when compared to others of similar backgrounds. In France, Binet was tasked with identifying students that needed additional assistance in their educational journey as compulsory attendance became mandatory (Cherry, 2019). This led to the creation of the Binet-Simon scale, which later became known as the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale when it was standardized by Stanford University psychologist, Lewis Terman (United States Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, 1992). Because many modern standardized tests are based on Binet and Simon’s measure of intelligence theory and, likewise, the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, this theory is an appropriate choice for this study which seeks to improve standardized assessment scores.
According to Bertolini et al. (2012), several factors impact students’ performance on standardized tests. There are also several strategies that may be implemented at various levels within the structure of a school to help improve students’ performance on standardized tests (Education World, 2019; Garcia & Thornton, 2014; National Association of Elementary School Principals, 2011). This research sought to identify themes related to the problem of students’ low-test scores on the OEA for Science, which is a standardized test; thus, Binet and Simon’s (1916) Measurement of Intelligence Theory is a logical choice for this research.
References
Bertolini, K., Stremmel, A., & Thorngren, J. (2012). Student achievement factors (ED569687). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED568687.pdf
Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1916). The development of intelligence in children: The Binet-Simon scale. Williams & Wilkins, Co. https://doi.org/10.1037/11069-000
Cherry, K. (2019). Alfred Binet and the history of IQ testing. Very Well Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/history-of-intelligence-testing-2795581
Education World. (2019). Boosting test scores: Principal strategies that work. https://www.educationworld.com/a_admin/admin/admin366.shtml
Garcia, L. E., & Thornton, O. (2014, November 18). The enduring importance of parental involvement. NEA Today. http://neatoday.org/2014/11/18/the-enduring-importance-of-parental-involvement-2/
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design an implementation (4th ed.). Wiley Publishing.
National Association of Elementary School Principles. (2011). Using student achievement data to support instructional decision making. http://www.naesp.org/sites/default/files/Student_Data_0.pdf
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1992). Testing in American schools: Asking the right questions. U.S. Government Printing Office.
Criteria Ratings Points
Scholarly
Tone and
literature
35 to >32.0 pts
Advanced
Level one and two
headings are coherently
aligned with the theory
and research and are
supported throughout the
body of the paper using
scholarly literature and
written in a scholarly
tone.
32 to >22.0 pts
Proficient
Level one and two
headings are coherently
aligned with the theory
and research and are
mostly supported
throughout the body of
the paper using scholarly
literature and somewhat
written in a scholarly
tone.
22 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Some headings are missing
or are not coherently aligned
with the theory and research
and are not well supported
throughout the body of the
paper using scholarly
literature. Lacks scholarly
tone.
0 pts
Not
Present
35 pts
Content 70 to >63.0 pts
Advanced
The theory and theorist
are included. One theory
is well-developed. An
explanation for how the
theory is appropriate for
the research is clearly
described.The author’s
voice is heard throughout
the paper.
63 to >58.0 pts
Proficient
The theory and theorist
are included. One theory
is mostly well-developed.
An explanation for how
the theory is appropriate
for the research is mostly
described.The author’s
voice is somewhat heard
throughout the paper.
58 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The theory and/or theorist are
missing. The theory lacks
development. An explanation
for how the theory is
appropriate for the research
is vaguely described or
missing. The author’s voice is
vaguely heard throughout the
paper.
0 pts
Not
Present
70 pts
Current
APA,
Mechanics,
Format &
Length
45 to >38.0 pts
Advanced
Paper is free of
mechanical and current
APA errors. 100% of the
length requirement is
met. All five sources are
peer-reviewed and clearly
related to the topic. One
source may be non-peer
reviewed to account for
the original theorist.
38 to >36.0 pts
Proficient
Few mechanical and/or
current APA errors exist.
Length of the paper is
met by 90% to 99%. Four
sources are
peer-reviewed and
clearly related to the
topic. One source may be
non-peer reviewed to
account for the original
theorist.
36 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Several mechanical and/or
current APA errors exist.
Length of the paper is met by
less than 90%. Fewer than
four sources are
peer-reviewed. One source
may be non-peer reviewed to
account for the original
theorist. Some sources are
not clearly related to the
topic.
0 pts
Not
Present
45 pts
Total Points: 150
Theoretical Framework Grading Rubric | EDUC850_B12_202230

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more